ITC Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • ITC Updates
  • Advanced Topics
  • Domestic Industry
  • Discovery
  • Commission Opinions
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
Select Page
Indefinite Patent at the ITC May Survive in District Court

Indefinite Patent at the ITC May Survive in District Court

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Dec 23, 2019 | Claim Construction, Federal Circuit Appeals, Invalidity

[co-author: Charles Lee] In a recent order issued in the Northern District of Texas, Judge Godbey denied a Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion despite the Federal Circuit’s holding that the asserted patent was invalid as indefinite. Hyosung TNS, Inc. v....
Indefinite Patent at the ITC May Survive in District Court

Defaulting Respondent Left Holding the Bag

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Nov 15, 2019 | Commission Opinions, Default, Exclusion Orders

A recent opinion by the Commission highlights the risk for defaulting at the ITC.  The Commission reversed the ALJ’s finding of a violation as to the participating respondents but maintained that the defaulting respondent was in violation of Section 337...
Indefinite Patent at the ITC May Survive in District Court

ITC Grants Request for Carve-Out in Limited Exclusion Order With Certification Provision

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Oct 31, 2019 | Carveout, Exclusion Order Modification, Exclusion Orders, Motion Practice

  In a recent Initial Determination (“ID”), ALJ McNamara indicated that the inclusion of a certification provision in the Limited Exclusion Order (“LEO”) was warranted to allow the respondent to import non-infringing redesigns. In re...
Indefinite Patent at the ITC May Survive in District Court

Returns Count as Sales under Section 337

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Oct 28, 2019 | Importation Requirement, Remedial Orders

  From a conceptual standpoint, one might think there is a difference between selling an item and charging for a leased item that was never returned.  However, a recent decision from the ITC held that charging fees for unreturned rental equipment qualifies...
Indefinite Patent at the ITC May Survive in District Court

ITC Issues GEO to Protect Domestic Manufacturer From Anonymous Online Sales

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Oct 10, 2019 | Exclusion Orders, General Exclusion Orders, Infringement

  In a recent Commission opinion, the ITC reviewed and affirmed ALJ Bullock’s Initial Determination (ID), and issued a general exclusion order (“GEO”).  Certain Self-Anchoring Beverage Containers, Inv. 337-TA-1092, Comm’n Op....
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 100 Day Pilot Program
  • Carveout
  • Claim Construction
  • Commission Opinions
  • Confidentiality
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Domestic Industry
  • Enforcement Proceedings
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Exclusion Order Modification
  • Exclusion Orders
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit Appeals
  • General Exclusion Orders
  • Importation Requirement
  • Infringement
  • Initial Determinations
  • Invalidity
  • ITC Rulemaking
  • ITC Updates
  • Jurisdiction
  • Licensee-Based Domestic Industry
  • Motion Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preclusion
  • Prior Art Issues
  • Redesign
  • Remedial Orders
  • Settlement
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Summary Determination
  • Trademark / Trade Dress
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • Cookie Policy
    • About
    • Advanced Topics
    • Contributors
    • Contacts
    • ITC Updates

    Copyright © 2026 Jones Day. All rights reserved.

    The content of this blog is intended to convey general information about litigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Jones Day does not sponsor, endorse, verify, or warrant the accuracy of the information found at external sites or subsequent links. The content of any Internet e-mail sent to Jones Day or any of its lawyers at the e-mail addresses set forth in this blog will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. All uses of the contents of this blog, other than personal uses, are prohibited.