ITC Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • ITC Updates
  • Advanced Topics
  • Domestic Industry
  • Discovery
  • Commission Opinions
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
Select Page
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Oct 3, 2019 | Invalidity, Prior Art Issues

Since their inception as part of the AIA, inter partes reviews (IPRs) have been a favorite tool in the arsenal of patent challengers.  Their statutorily mandated 18-month schedule oftentimes allows the PTAB to resolve a question of patent validity...
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

Ground Rules Preclude New Rebuttal Expert Opinions

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Jun 24, 2019 | Discovery, Evidentiary Issues, Expert Witnesses, Prior Art Issues

Shortly before the evidentiary hearing, ALJ Lord granted Complainant’s motion in limine and excluded certain testimony in the witness statement of Respondents’ expert as precluded by her ground rules governing expert testimony.  In re...
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

ITC Refuses to Include in Exhibits An Email Not Timely Produced During Discovery

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Jun 7, 2019 | Discovery, Evidentiary Issues, Prior Art Issues

  On April 8, 2019, ALJ Cheney issued an order denying the addition of an email to the exhibit list at the eve of the evidentiary hearing.  Certain Strontium-Rubidium Radioisotope Infusion Systems, and Components Thereof Including Generators, Inv....
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

ITC Permits Addition of Invalidity Defense Previously Raised By Terminated Respondent

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Mar 18, 2019 | Invalidity, Motion Practice, Prior Art Issues

[co-author: Robert Levent (Levent) Hergüner, Law Clerk] Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) McNamara’s recent order suggests that respondents may be permitted to add defenses if another respondent makes the complainant aware of the defense during discovery. See In the...
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

ITC Proceedings Do Not Trigger One Year Clock to File IPR

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Mar 28, 2017 | Invalidity, Prior Art Issues

  Increasing use of Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) by patent stakeholders and an increase in the number of ITC complaints heighten the importance of an interplay between IPRs and ITC proceedings.  We have previously noted that the ITC does not...

About this blog

Categories

  • 100 Day Pilot Program
  • Carveout
  • Claim Construction
  • Commission Opinions
  • Confidentiality
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Domestic Industry
  • Enforcement Proceedings
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Exclusion Order Modification
  • Exclusion Orders
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit Appeals
  • General Exclusion Orders
  • Importation Requirement
  • Infringement
  • Initial Determinations
  • Invalidity
  • ITC Rulemaking
  • ITC Updates
  • Jurisdiction
  • Licensee-Based Domestic Industry
  • Motion Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preclusion
  • Prior Art Issues
  • Redesign
  • Remedial Orders
  • Settlement
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Summary Determination
  • Trademark / Trade Dress
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • Cookie Policy
    • About
    • Advanced Topics
    • Contributors
    • Contacts
    • ITC Updates

    Copyright © 2026 Jones Day. All rights reserved.

    The content of this blog is intended to convey general information about litigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Jones Day does not sponsor, endorse, verify, or warrant the accuracy of the information found at external sites or subsequent links. The content of any Internet e-mail sent to Jones Day or any of its lawyers at the e-mail addresses set forth in this blog will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. All uses of the contents of this blog, other than personal uses, are prohibited.