ITC Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • ITC Updates
  • Advanced Topics
  • Domestic Industry
  • Discovery
  • Commission Opinions
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
Select Page
ITC’s Trademark Decisions Are Not Entitled To Preclusive Effect

ITC’s Trademark Decisions Are Not Entitled To Preclusive Effect

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | May 16, 2019 | Estoppel, Preclusion, Trademark / Trade Dress

  Last week the Federal Circuit held that, like patent decisions, ITC decisions pertaining to trademark infringement and validity are not entitled to preclusive effect.  Swagway v ITC, No. 2018-1672 (May 9, 2019).  The Court reached its conclusion...
ITC’s Trademark Decisions Are Not Entitled To Preclusive Effect

ITC Provides a Way to Work Around IPR Estoppel

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Oct 31, 2018 | Estoppel, Invalidity

  In In re Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1058 (ITC October 2, 2018, Order), Administrative Law Judge Cheney ruled that even if a respondent is estopped from raising certain invalidity challenges because it failed...
ITC’s Trademark Decisions Are Not Entitled To Preclusive Effect

Some ITC Decisions Create Collateral Estoppel

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Jun 8, 2018 | Estoppel, Preclusion

  While patent decisions from the ITC do not have collateral estoppel effects on later district court cases, other ITC decisions may create collateral estoppel. In a case of first impression, a district court recently ruled that an earlier trade-secret...
ITC’s Trademark Decisions Are Not Entitled To Preclusive Effect

Commission to Weigh in on IPR Estoppel

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Dec 12, 2017 | Commission Opinions, Estoppel, Invalidity

The Commission has determined to review an initial determination finding that Respondent Ford is estopped under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) from asserting certain invalidity defenses previously adjudicated by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)...

About this blog

Categories

  • 100 Day Pilot Program
  • Carveout
  • Claim Construction
  • Commission Opinions
  • Confidentiality
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Domestic Industry
  • Enforcement Proceedings
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Exclusion Order Modification
  • Exclusion Orders
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit Appeals
  • General Exclusion Orders
  • Importation Requirement
  • Infringement
  • Initial Determinations
  • Invalidity
  • ITC Rulemaking
  • ITC Updates
  • Jurisdiction
  • Licensee-Based Domestic Industry
  • Motion Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preclusion
  • Prior Art Issues
  • Redesign
  • Remedial Orders
  • Settlement
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Summary Determination
  • Trademark / Trade Dress
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • Cookie Policy
    • About
    • Advanced Topics
    • Contributors
    • Contacts
    • ITC Updates

    Copyright © 2026 Jones Day. All rights reserved.

    The content of this blog is intended to convey general information about litigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Jones Day does not sponsor, endorse, verify, or warrant the accuracy of the information found at external sites or subsequent links. The content of any Internet e-mail sent to Jones Day or any of its lawyers at the e-mail addresses set forth in this blog will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. All uses of the contents of this blog, other than personal uses, are prohibited.