ITC Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • ITC Updates
  • Advanced Topics
  • Domestic Industry
  • Discovery
  • Commission Opinions
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
Select Page
ITC Recommends GEO Against Inexpensive Slider Devices Sold Through E-Commerce Websites

ITC Recommends GEO Against Inexpensive Slider Devices Sold Through E-Commerce Websites

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Jul 31, 2020 | Exclusion Orders, General Exclusion Orders, Infringement

  In a recently issued initial determination, the ITC granted summary determination on violation and recommended issuance of a general exclusion order (“GEO”) against respondents after finding that a limited exclusion order (“LEO”) would likely be circumvented,...
Redesign Cleared Following Adverse Initial Determination

Redesign Cleared Following Adverse Initial Determination

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Jul 8, 2020 | Exclusion Orders, Initial Determinations, Motion Practice, Redesign

  In an dispute involving garage door openers, Respondent successfully utilized a Modification Proceeding pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337(k) to obtain a determination from the ITC that its redesigned product did not infringe the asserted patent.  After an...
Defaulting Respondent Left Holding the Bag

Defaulting Respondent Left Holding the Bag

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Nov 15, 2019 | Commission Opinions, Default, Exclusion Orders

A recent opinion by the Commission highlights the risk for defaulting at the ITC.  The Commission reversed the ALJ’s finding of a violation as to the participating respondents but maintained that the defaulting respondent was in violation of Section 337...
Defaulting Respondent Left Holding the Bag

ITC Grants Request for Carve-Out in Limited Exclusion Order With Certification Provision

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Oct 31, 2019 | Carveout, Exclusion Order Modification, Exclusion Orders, Motion Practice

  In a recent Initial Determination (“ID”), ALJ McNamara indicated that the inclusion of a certification provision in the Limited Exclusion Order (“LEO”) was warranted to allow the respondent to import non-infringing redesigns. In re...
Defaulting Respondent Left Holding the Bag

ITC Issues GEO to Protect Domestic Manufacturer From Anonymous Online Sales

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Oct 10, 2019 | Exclusion Orders, General Exclusion Orders, Infringement

  In a recent Commission opinion, the ITC reviewed and affirmed ALJ Bullock’s Initial Determination (ID), and issued a general exclusion order (“GEO”).  Certain Self-Anchoring Beverage Containers, Inv. 337-TA-1092, Comm’n Op....
Defaulting Respondent Left Holding the Bag

ITC Issues General Exclusion Order Based on Uncontested Evidence of Widespread Infringement

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Sep 11, 2019 | Evidentiary Issues, Exclusion Orders, General Exclusion Orders, Infringement

  In a recent opinion, the ITC found that four defaulting respondents violated section 337 and that a general exclusion order (GEO) was the appropriate remedy for unlicensed products.  Certain LED Lighting Devices and Components Thereof, Inv. No....
« Older Entries

About this blog

Categories

  • 100 Day Pilot Program
  • Carveout
  • Claim Construction
  • Commission Opinions
  • Confidentiality
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Domestic Industry
  • Enforcement Proceedings
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Exclusion Order Modification
  • Exclusion Orders
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit Appeals
  • General Exclusion Orders
  • Importation Requirement
  • Infringement
  • Initial Determinations
  • Invalidity
  • ITC Rulemaking
  • ITC Updates
  • Jurisdiction
  • Licensee-Based Domestic Industry
  • Motion Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preclusion
  • Prior Art Issues
  • Redesign
  • Remedial Orders
  • Settlement
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Summary Determination
  • Trademark / Trade Dress
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • Cookie Policy
    • About
    • Advanced Topics
    • Contributors
    • Contacts
    • ITC Updates

    Copyright © 2026 Jones Day. All rights reserved.

    The content of this blog is intended to convey general information about litigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Jones Day does not sponsor, endorse, verify, or warrant the accuracy of the information found at external sites or subsequent links. The content of any Internet e-mail sent to Jones Day or any of its lawyers at the e-mail addresses set forth in this blog will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. All uses of the contents of this blog, other than personal uses, are prohibited.