ITC Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • ITC Updates
  • Advanced Topics
  • Domestic Industry
  • Discovery
  • Commission Opinions
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
Select Page
ITC Denies Request to Use its Early Disposition Program for Domestic Industry

ITC Denies Request to Use its Early Disposition Program for Domestic Industry

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Apr 23, 2020 | 100 Day Pilot Program, Discovery

By: Charles Lee and Vishal Khatri – On March 31, 2020, the ITC issued an order denying Respondents’ request to use the Early Disposition Program.  Certain Electronic Candle Products and Components Thereof, Inv. 337-TA-1195.  The ITC concluded that the issue of...
ITC Modifies Filing Procedures Due to COVID-19

ITC Modifies Filing Procedures Due to COVID-19

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Mar 20, 2020 | ITC Updates, Uncategorized

By Levent Herguner and David Maiorana – On March 16, 2019, the ITC implemented a temporary change to filing procedures in light of the global COVID-19 pandemic.  The accompanying notice stated that the ITC will temporarily waive and amend its rules that require the...
Show Me The Money: Only Quantitative Investment Data Can Satisfy the Domestic Industry Requirement

Show Me The Money: Only Quantitative Investment Data Can Satisfy the Domestic Industry Requirement

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Mar 19, 2020 | Domestic Industry

  In a recently issued Commission Opinion, the ITC affirmed ALJ Bullock’s application of the Federal Circuit’s rule that a quantitative analysis must be performed in order to determine whether a complainant has satisfied the economic prong of the...
Show Me The Money: Only Quantitative Investment Data Can Satisfy the Domestic Industry Requirement

Imported Articles Satisfy the ITC’s Domestic Industry Requirement When Domestic Value-Add is Shown

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Jan 23, 2020 | Domestic Industry, Importation Requirement, Initial Determinations

In a recently issued Initial Determination, ALJ McNamara ruled that beer containers imported into the U.S. satisfied the domestic industry requirement when the Complainants were able to show significant domestic value-add.  Certain Beverage Dispensing...
Show Me The Money: Only Quantitative Investment Data Can Satisfy the Domestic Industry Requirement

ITC Invalidates Road Paving Machine Patent for Being An Abstract Idea

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Jan 6, 2020 | Commission Opinions, Invalidity, Patent Eligible Subject Matter

  In a recently issued Commission Opinion, the ITC affirmed the ALJ’s finding that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,045,871 (the ’871 patent) are invalid as directed to an abstract idea.  Certain Road Construction Machines &...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 100 Day Pilot Program
  • Carveout
  • Claim Construction
  • Commission Opinions
  • Confidentiality
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Domestic Industry
  • Enforcement Proceedings
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Exclusion Order Modification
  • Exclusion Orders
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit Appeals
  • General Exclusion Orders
  • Importation Requirement
  • Infringement
  • Initial Determinations
  • Invalidity
  • ITC Rulemaking
  • ITC Updates
  • Jurisdiction
  • Licensee-Based Domestic Industry
  • Motion Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preclusion
  • Prior Art Issues
  • Redesign
  • Remedial Orders
  • Settlement
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Summary Determination
  • Trademark / Trade Dress
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • Cookie Policy
    • About
    • Advanced Topics
    • Contributors
    • Contacts
    • ITC Updates

    Copyright © 2026 Jones Day. All rights reserved.

    The content of this blog is intended to convey general information about litigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Jones Day does not sponsor, endorse, verify, or warrant the accuracy of the information found at external sites or subsequent links. The content of any Internet e-mail sent to Jones Day or any of its lawyers at the e-mail addresses set forth in this blog will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. All uses of the contents of this blog, other than personal uses, are prohibited.