ITC Litigation Blog
  • Home
  • About
  • ITC Updates
  • Advanced Topics
  • Domestic Industry
  • Discovery
  • Commission Opinions
  • Contributors
  • Contacts
Select Page
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Oct 3, 2019 | Invalidity, Prior Art Issues

Since their inception as part of the AIA, inter partes reviews (IPRs) have been a favorite tool in the arsenal of patent challengers.  Their statutorily mandated 18-month schedule oftentimes allows the PTAB to resolve a question of patent validity...
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

ITC Terminates Investigation With Respect To Patents Set to Expire before Target Date

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Sep 26, 2019 | Initial Determinations, Motion Practice

  A recent Initial Determination (“ID”) by ALJ Cheney illustrates how the government shutdown earlier this year effectively made this ITC investigation “toothless” since relief was not practicable before the patents would expire. Certain...
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

ITC Issues General Exclusion Order Based on Uncontested Evidence of Widespread Infringement

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Sep 11, 2019 | Evidentiary Issues, Exclusion Orders, General Exclusion Orders, Infringement

  In a recent opinion, the ITC found that four defaulting respondents violated section 337 and that a general exclusion order (GEO) was the appropriate remedy for unlicensed products.  Certain LED Lighting Devices and Components Thereof, Inv. No....
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

The ITC Swears In Two New Commissioners

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Aug 28, 2019 | ITC Updates

  The ITC has sworn in two new Commissioners.  Randolph J. Stayin was sworn in on August 23, 2019, and Amy A. Karpel was sworn in on August 26, 2019.  The Senate confirmed both Stayin and Karpel on August 1, 2019, and they replace two Commissioners...
IPR Goes Forward Despite Late Stage Parallel ITC Investigation

Live Testimony Remains Important in ITC Investigations

by Jones Day's ITC Litigation Team | Jul 25, 2019 | Evidentiary Issues

  When parties jointly stipulate to witness statements rather than live direct and cross examination, one might expect the ITC to be receptive to their agreement—after all, such stipulations may save time and resources for everyone involved.  However,...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »

About this blog

Categories

  • 100 Day Pilot Program
  • Carveout
  • Claim Construction
  • Commission Opinions
  • Confidentiality
  • Default
  • Discovery
  • Domestic Industry
  • Enforcement Proceedings
  • Estoppel
  • Evidentiary Issues
  • Exclusion Order Modification
  • Exclusion Orders
  • Expert Witnesses
  • Federal Circuit Appeals
  • General Exclusion Orders
  • Importation Requirement
  • Infringement
  • Initial Determinations
  • Invalidity
  • ITC Rulemaking
  • ITC Updates
  • Jurisdiction
  • Licensee-Based Domestic Industry
  • Motion Practice
  • Other News
  • Patent Eligible Subject Matter
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Preclusion
  • Prior Art Issues
  • Redesign
  • Remedial Orders
  • Settlement
  • Standing
  • Stay
  • Summary Determination
  • Trademark / Trade Dress
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Links

www.jonesday.com

About Jones Day's Intellectual Property Practice

Subscribe to Jones Day publications

    • Privacy
    • Cookie Policy
    • About
    • Advanced Topics
    • Contributors
    • Contacts
    • ITC Updates

    Copyright © 2026 Jones Day. All rights reserved.

    The content of this blog is intended to convey general information about litigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Jones Day does not sponsor, endorse, verify, or warrant the accuracy of the information found at external sites or subsequent links. The content of any Internet e-mail sent to Jones Day or any of its lawyers at the e-mail addresses set forth in this blog will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not be treated as confidential. All uses of the contents of this blog, other than personal uses, are prohibited.